Skip to content
ArmoSystems
Service

AI integration

Language models take a few jobs off your hands and many others not at all. We sort that out before money is spent, build a pilot and measure it with the same clock as everything else.

Precondition
A task that comes up often and involves text
Pilot
Four weeks, one department, measured before and after
Limit
No customer or staff data in services without a contract

Where it has paid off so far

Six applications that save time in companies of this size. All of them have one thing in common: a person checks the result.

Drafting text
A quotation, a rejection, a reply to a complaint: the draft appears in seconds, and it is checked and signed as before. The time is not saved on typing — it is saved because nobody sits in front of an empty page.
Searching your own documents
Old quotations, assembly instructions, standards, test records. The question is asked in plain sentences and the answer comes with the source. Without the source the answer is worthless — we build for that.
Dictating instead of typing
The site manager speaks the report into the phone and the text arrives sorted in the system. On site, wearing gloves, that is the difference between recorded and not recorded.
Paper into figures
Reading delivery notes and incoming invoices, taking over items and amounts. Saves the retyping and the transposed digits that come with it.
Sorting the post
Recognising incoming enquiries and routing them to the right person. Useful from the point where enquiries sit unanswered because nobody feels responsible.
Translating
Instructions, safety briefings, correspondence. Good enough for internal use; not for contracts.

Where it brings nothing

This list matters more to us than the one before it.

  • When the data is wrong. A model invents the order that is missing from the data — and words it convincingly.
  • When the task comes up twice a month. Setting it up and looking after it costs more than the saving.
  • Forecasts from a handful of numbers. The workload of a twenty-person company is not statistics, it is a handful of dates.
  • Decisions that have to be justified — prices, staff, dismissals. Leave those to a machine and you have nothing in your hand in court.
  • Anything where a mistake goes unnoticed. If nobody checks the result, using it is dangerous, not economical.
  • A chatbot on the website, as long as the telephone goes unanswered.

How we go about it

The same order as everywhere else on this site: calculate first, then build, then measure again.

Collecting and sorting the use cases
Everything that comes up often and involves text, speech or images. Sorted by frequency times duration times the cost of errors. What ends up on top goes into the pilot — usually one thing, at most two.
Settling data protection first
Which data would leave the building, to whom, on what legal basis. That question is answered before the tool is chosen, not after.
A measured pilot
Four weeks, one department. Before it starts we measure how long the task takes, and afterwards we measure again. Without those two figures anything can be claimed later.
Building in a check
Who checks the result, how do they recognise a mistake, what happens when they find one. A model that is occasionally wrong is usable; one whose mistakes nobody notices is not.
Instruction
People need to know when not to believe the thing. That is not a courtesy — since the EU AI Act it is an obligation.

Where the data goes

Three routes, with rising effort and falling risk.

Public service
Fast and cheap. Without a data processing agreement no customer data, no staff data and no costings belong there. For general drafts with no link to a person it is enough.
A provider with a contract and servers in the EU
Data processing agreement, an assured storage location, no use of your input for training. The usual route for anything that touches real business.
A model in your own building
Open models run on a machine at your site; nothing leaves the network. Needs a suitable graphics card and somebody to look after it. Worth it when documents are constantly involved that are nobody else's business.
What belongs nowhere
Health data, job applications, costings, drawings, anything under a confidentiality agreement. Not because of the technology, but because a breach costs more than any time saved.

What the law requires

The EU AI Act applies in stages. Four points matter for a company of your size.

Your people have to be able to handle it
Anyone using AI in a company must make sure the staff understand what the tool can do and where it goes wrong. An hour of instruction with examples does it; a circular does not.
It has to be recognisable
Anyone writing to a machine must be able to tell. This mainly concerns chat functions on the website and automatic replies.
Not every application is harmless
Most applications in the trades count as low risk. Two areas do not: selecting applicants, and monitoring the performance or conduct of staff. Stricter rules apply there, and the works council (Betriebsrat) has to be involved.
The liability stays with you
For a wrong quotation, a wrong statement, a wrong dimension, you are liable — not the provider of the model. "The AI said so" is not a defence.

This is not legal advice. We tell you at which point you need a lawyer, and write down what they need to know.

What of this suits your company

Of what is currently written about AI, the smaller part is usable for a company with ten to fifty employees. Sorting that out is our job, not yours.

  • What almost always works: searching your own documents, dictating instead of typing, drafting text.
  • What rarely works: training your own models, forecasts, a chatbot for customers.
  • What we make of it: one or two use cases, a four-week pilot, and afterwards a figure instead of an opinion.

If there is no saving at the end of the pilot, we say so and build nothing further. A tool that only saves in the brochure costs twice over in the workshop.

Name us a task where a lot gets typed.

Ten minutes on the phone are enough to estimate whether AI saves anything there or only keeps people busy.

Phone+49 162 495 4485 E-mailarmen.hovsepyan@armosystems.de ArmoSystems · Armen Hovsepyan · Finnentrop
← Back to the services